When modern tax systems were designed, women were not in the room. The men who drafted the codes decided what counted as essential. Bread, books, and medicine made the list. Menstrual products did not.

That is how a biological function became a taxable event. The tampon tax is not a special levy. It is simply the ordinary sales or value-added tax applied to pads and tampons because no one thought to classify them as necessities.

In Japan, these products are still taxed like beauty items. In the United States, many states treat them as non-essential while groceries, medicines, and even Viagra are tax-free. Every receipt carries the same quiet message. The system was designed without women, and women have been paying for that oversight ever since.

tripfest_An_illustrated_historical_scene_of_a_formal_governme_50c2811e-a0ff-4f58-88f9-d56b8b67ea50_0.png

When Equality Gets Lost in Economics

Governments often say the tampon tax is too small to matter. In the United Kingdom, it once brought in fifteen million pounds a year. In the American state of Alabama, it adds about seven million dollars to yearly revenue. Those amounts barely register in national budgets, yet they reveal how easily inequality hides behind routine accounting.

When countries remove the tax, prices do not always change. Research from the University of Chicago found that when five US states ended the tampon tax, retailers kept around 80 percent of the savings instead of passing them to customers. In Tanzania, the government reintroduced its 18 percent tax after prices stayed the same.

ChatGPT Image Dec 18, 2025, 03_15_04 PM.png

To show how small this revenue really is, the numbers below illustrate scale.

UK annual revenue before repeal: £15 million
US total revenue (22 states): ≈ $120 million combined
Average national budgets: $1–2 trillion

That means menstrual-product taxes make up less than 0.01 percent of government income, while affecting half the population.

When Biology Becomes a Barrier

For many women, the tampon tax is only one piece of a larger struggle. The real problem is affordability itself. Around the world, more than five hundred million people live with period poverty.

In Kenya, pads cost about seventy shillings, roughly half a US dollar, yet many still cannot afford them. Studies show that two out of three women and girls there cannot buy sanitary pads even after the tax was removed. In India, the twelve percent tax was scrapped in 2018, but seventy percent of women still rely on cloth or unsafe substitutes. In the United States, one in four teenagers has missed school because they did not have menstrual supplies.

Period poverty is not only about price. It affects education, health, and dignity. A missing pad can mean a missed opportunity. Each absence reminds society that menstrual health is still treated as private when it should be public.

Free, Fair, and Finally Seen

Change began in Kenya in 2004 when it became the first country to remove the tampon tax. Few noticed then, but the decision inspired others. Over the next two decades, forty-eight countries followed. Australia, India, South Africa, and the United Kingdom each took their turn to rewrite the rulebook. The results have been mixed. In the United Kingdom, prices dropped only slightly. In Mexico, the government introduced a price-monitoring system when it removed its sixteen percent tax in 2022. It worked. Despite high inflation, menstrual-product prices fell.

ChatGPT Image Dec 18, 2025, 03_23_23 PM.png

Some countries went further. Scotland became the first nation to make period products free for everyone in 2022. People can now use an app called PickupMyPeriod to find supplies nearby. That small tool turned a policy into access.

To make reform last, countries need more than tax cuts. They can:

Monitor pricing to stop companies from keeping savings.
Distribute products in schools, prisons, and workplaces.
Include menstrual health in public-health budgets and education.

These steps move beyond relief to true menstrual equity, where no woman pays a price for biology.